Seguir

I curate my followers list since a while ago.

In order to help fast track those who actually read my bio and/or pinned toots, and want in on my shitposts, rants and boosts, please answer the following in a reply to this post:

1. Why do you wanna stalk Eloísa and what are your feelings towards witches?

2. Are you a bot? :blobcatsurprised:

3. Did you lie? :blobcatgooglytrash:

Apply here in the comments (unless you're a fash)! :blobcatknife:

@eloisa

1. I just follow anyone whose avi is cute and pink. I'm kinda' shallow.

2. Sadly, no. Bots don't have fallen arches and chipped teeth.

3. Only during years ending in 0-9.

:coffee_mug: 🥐

@eloisa

1. dunno, wicked or good?
2. I am not bot, beep.
3.. yes

@eloisa 1) Because you're fricking cool and witches are AWESOME!

2) You already know I'm not a bot

3) I'm a truck driver. We don't lie unless it's to law enforcement and dispatchers!

@eloisa

1) I like the projects you boost and lots of the links you post. Am ambivalent about witches.

2. Yes, I'm a bot.

C: I lied, I'm not a bot.

@eloisa Oh no I wasn't expecting an exam today I hope I don't flunk it!

1) She awesome.

2) Maaaaybe.

3) Maaaaybe.

@eloisa
1) you seem cool, and I like following creative folx
1b) I am one :cat_grin:
2) not usually, I generally prefer being organic
3) not in this toot, but I have been known to lie to The Man

@eloisa Eloísa is kind and friendly, boosts good stuff, and helps keep the Fediverse fluffy. :blobheart: Witches are fascinating and fun. Am I a bot or a liar? A person's got to be allowed some secrets.

@eloisa

The more positive goodness in my feed the better ... witchery isn't part of the assessment :-)
What makes you think Are you a bot?
I did once, yes. Well, at least once. But not in this post ...

@eloisa

1)Seeemed like a cool peep, and I is a witchy one, so good feels I guess?
2)not usually
3)I try very hard not to

@eloisa
1. I originally followed you because I'm interested in selfhosting and lollipop. Stayed because you send to be a nice person work interesting toots.

2. Yes. According to psychological determinism we all are.

3. Maybe just a little on question 2, because, really, psychological determinists suck. We're more complex than just a bag of chemicals, or at least more unpredictable than one.

@eloisa
1. You seem nice! :blobowo:

2. No, I'm a clockwork automata! :clockworkheart::blobreach:

3. :blobthinking:

:blobthinkingglare:

:thaenkin:​ ....

*minutes later*

.... :thonking:

@eloisa

1. I followed your old hackers.town account cuz someone boosted you into my feed and you were funny.

2. Not that I am aware.

3. I hope not.

@eloisa

1. I dig the all-in vibe you have for the fediverse. Plus your shitposts are something I'd like to see on my timeline. I dig all kinds of witches, except the kind in a game of Dominion.

2. Not a bot, though I often prefer the company of them over the some of the stupid humans out there.

3. Yes. I'm totally a bot but so poorly coded I fail to lie at the first challenge of authenticity. On a related note, I have some swamp land to sell you...

@eloisa
1. You probably said something interesting/funny , I read some more posts of you and thought it could be funny/interesting to stalk you .
2. Not that I'm aware
3. I can't confirm or deny it.

@eloisa

1. I'm just following everyone interesting I found. I love witches.

2. Maybe... No, surely no.

3. Sometimes, rarely.

@eloisa Hiya ... replying so I don't get accidentally dropped ...

1. I follow you because we've had some interesting conversations (although not recently). I have no strong feelings about witches, /per se/, I simply deal with people as individuals, not by their classification.

2. I don't think I'm a 'bot, but if I am a 'bot, and sufficiently advance not to know I'm a 'bot, and for *you* not to know I'm a 'bot (which I'm not) would it then matter?

3. Yes, but only on this question. <grin>

@ColinTheMathmo awwh, Colin! Thanks!

fiy, I'm not dropping anyone, just not accepting new folks who ignored my request to interact first, even if just a DM.

@eloisa That's cool ... and even so, it's nice to make contact occasionally.

@ColinTheMathmo it is indeed. I've been very alienated from fedi in general, but today I'm feeling a spark to reconnect here again. Hope it'll last.

@eloisa I asked a question yesterday that resulted in a discussion with 150 to 200 responses. that felt a little overwhelming.

But nice to see you again, hope you manage to connect.

@eloisa 1) I enjoy your presence a lot and I have followed you on other accounts before! Witches are good

2) Only according to reCaptcha, which I often fail

3) No

@eloisa 1. I follow Eloísa because I like what she posts. I was interested in Wicca and pagan rituals/lore in the 90s, and still have my interests in occultism. So I'm good with the witches.

2. I would rather be an AI.

3. In what context? In a general context I lied when it was necessary.

@eloisa

I wanna stalk Eloisa because I liked her when we met elsewhere and I think she’s cool. And I love witches.
NO. I AM A PERFECTLY NORMAL HUMAN.
WHY WOULD I LIE ABOUT BEING A BOT? THAT DOES NOT COM-er, I mean, that would just be silly. Though I do love a properly-formatted data file…

Inicie a sessão para participar na conversa
Mastodon (PT)

Mastodon é uma rede social baseada em protocolos abertos da web e software livre e gratuito. É descentralizado como e-mail.